Why I’m a Mac (and proud of it)

Ever since transitioning over from PCland in early 2004, my Mac affiliation hasn’t been questioned much, due to the fact that most of the industry professionals around me also use them. It’s kind of like being a liberal in NY, nobody’s going to question your motives. This is all good and fine, until you find your Macness under attack. With your defenses down, it’s hard to think of a good response, and you can end up looking silly.

This is exactly what’s been happening to me recently, and being sick of my weak responses, one night I got to thinking, why am I a Mac?

Well, I know why I’m not a ‘Windows’. As someone who’s grown up online, and turned professional web developer during the birth of web 2.0, I’ve been pretty spoiled by innovation in software. I demand it, and any company who can’t provide me with such a service is not worth my time. I don’t have time to wait 3 years for a buggy web browser, and I definitely don’t have time to wait 8 years for a crummy OS. Add to that viruses, trojans, adware, malware, and spyware… you know, I think I’ll pass, kthxbai.

I also know why I’m not on Linux. Several times during my childhood I would have Linux phases, where I was just too annoyed / bored by Windows, and wanted to experience the ‘nix way of life. I had heard such good things about it, after all, and it really is the best line of OSes. The problem with this, was at the age of 15 I was no computer science expert. I was just a kid who liked to play around with websites, so compiling my own drivers so I could play a DVD was not my idea of a fun time. I wanted to like Linux as my OS, I really did, but at the end of the day I ended up missing the application support of Windows.

Then came along OS X. In early ‘04 I was in the market for a laptop, so I took the jump on the advice of a friend and got my first Mac, a PowerBook G4. It had OS X v10.3. I immediately liked it because of it’s ‘nix background. It had the security and stability of a super-solid OS in it’s FreeBSD backbone, yet there rarely is a need to get ‘down and dirty’ with the OS unless you wanted to. Even things like web services can be handled Terminal-free with programs such as MAMP and Locomotive. Mac had everything I needed, nothing I didn’t, and unlike my Linux phases, I didn’t miss Windows one bit.

In fact, as time went on, I became more and more immersed in the Mac world. The innovation is brilliant, with a new OS coming out roughly every 1.5 years. And if the OS innovation wasn’t enough, Mac boasts some of the most creative and useful apps on the planet. Case in point, they have the only decent svn gui in Versions, and there’s a wide array of homebrew companies like Omni and Panic, who release amazing software for really affordable prices. Mac is the incredible marriage of ‘nix and a commercialized support community, who not only pumps creativity and innovation in, but they do it on a really personal level. It all adds up to one big win.

A lot of the attacks against Mac tend to be in their business practices. Some of the top arguments I’ve heard:

  • “They stop supporting older technologies too quick”
  • “They’re not open-source”
  • “They dictate what you can build on it” (this is a huge argument against the iPhone)
  • and the all too famous, “They’re too expensive”

Granted, they’re pretty decent reasons, but with good comes bad and Apple needs these in place to be the innovators that they are. Yes, they do need to control the hardware a bit more, because that’s how the OS can be so streamlined. Yes, they have strict standards as far as development goes, but that’s how they keep the crap out, and provide a unified theme to the OS experience.

As far as costs go, I seem to be the only person who doesn’t think Mac’s are overpriced. Sure, you can get a flimsy Dell for $499, but you can also get a Kia, or you can get a Porsche. There’s clearly a difference in the manufacturing.

I’m not saying Apple’s the perfect company, but for this web professional at least, it’s clearly the best pick of the bunch.

2 Response to “Why I’m a Mac (and proud of it)”


  1. 1 Agent G

    I’m a long time Apple fan, and find these arguments amusing. So I thought I’d post a few responses to some of the arguments you’ve encountered.

    “They stop supporting older technologies too quick”

    Not sure exactly what this one is about. There was a time I only replaced my Mac every 4 or 5 years and it usually supported the latest OS when I did finally replace it… the replacement didn’t come from a lack of support but due to the fact that newer machines were so much faster. This might be an argument for the fact that they drop some technology faster than PC makers like floppy disks. But by the time they dropped the floppy it was barely used, all software was being sold on CDs and anyone serious about sharing files used a Zip drive (100mb vs.1.4 MB per floppy, come on).

    “They’re not open-source”

    I can’t see a Windows user saying this with a straight face. But maybe a Linux guy would… Darwin, Webkit, and etc are open source. Know what the most popular computer is for Sun employees… MacBook Pro, why? BSD + solid GUI + software that just works… basically the reasons you like it.

    “They dictate what you can build on it” (this is a huge argument against the iPhone)

    First off iPhone != Mac… but assuming this is about all things Apple… most phones won’t let you do crap with them, so this argument can only really be made against the smart phone class of devices… I had a Treo back in the day, and it hella sucked compared to the iPhone, yeah anyone could make software and post a crappy installer on some website… but with the iPhone it’s a dramaticlly smoother process to the point that it’s laughable. I had to wipe my Treo several times from installs and upgrades that went sour… yuck! So what Apple is doing is far more like putting up a crap filter and managing the process… besides if it’s not the case already it soon will be that more software is avail for the iPhone than any other smart phone… so they dictate but you still have more choices.

    “They’re too expensive”

    Compared to what? Every time I hear this argument the person making it almost always is comparing a Mac to a system with dramatically different specs. When I got my current MBP, out of curiosity, I checked the prices of similarly equiped Dells & etc. Guess what? the Mac came out ahead or about even with what they had to offer. Speaking purely hardware here… and even then there were some really nice feature in the MBP the others didn’t have, like a small size, no crappy plastic case, no iSight camera, no mag safe, no remote, lighted keyboard… and etc.

    As to arguments not mentioned here…
    The two biggest ones I use to hear aren’t really valid anymore since we have boot camp, and vmware…
    1. Less software (esp games)
    2. Work requires certian software that isn’t avail on the Mac.

    Next one is… can’t upgrade the hardware.
    This one is semi-true. You can upgrade things like the hard drive and memory on all Macs, but some other things are a bit harder like the video card or adding PCI cards. Although I’ve found that by the time I want to upgrade my video card or some other hard to upgrade part, the rest of the machine is quite out of date as well (processor, bus and etc.), such that it just makes more sense to upgrade the whole thing (less money than trying to upgrade every part).

    anyway… done ranting

    G

  1. 1 Why I’m a Mac (and proud of it)

Leave a Reply