<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Work is Bigger than Yourself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zahnster.com/industry-talk/your-work-is-bigger-than-yourself/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zahnster.com/industry-talk/your-work-is-bigger-than-yourself</link>
	<description>my name's jade. i'm a child of the internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert K</title>
		<link>http://zahnster.com/industry-talk/your-work-is-bigger-than-yourself/comment-page-1#comment-5354</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zahnster.com/?p=187#comment-5354</guid>
		<description>Hmm... is it really fair to criticize _why?

While I sort of understand your reasons for doing so, I don&#039;t agree with them.  _why gave far more to the community than he received.  And specifically, you benefited far more from his work than he did yours.  Thus, I would say you (and all of us) should be very circumspect in whatever criticisms we may choose to level at him.

I prefer &lt;a href=&quot;http://ejohn.org/blog/eulogy-to-_why/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John Resig&#039;s response&lt;/a&gt;:  Be grateful for the work he gave to the community and thank him for his contributions, without condition.

... and I would add to that:  Think long and hard about what contributions we can each make to the opensource community as a way of repaying _why for his work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; is it really fair to criticize _why?</p>
<p>While I sort of understand your reasons for doing so, I don&#8217;t agree with them.  _why gave far more to the community than he received.  And specifically, you benefited far more from his work than he did yours.  Thus, I would say you (and all of us) should be very circumspect in whatever criticisms we may choose to level at him.</p>
<p>I prefer <a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/eulogy-to-_why/" rel="nofollow">John Resig&#8217;s response</a>:  Be grateful for the work he gave to the community and thank him for his contributions, without condition.</p>
<p>&#8230; and I would add to that:  Think long and hard about what contributions we can each make to the opensource community as a way of repaying _why for his work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psionides</title>
		<link>http://zahnster.com/industry-talk/your-work-is-bigger-than-yourself/comment-page-1#comment-5301</link>
		<dc:creator>Psionides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zahnster.com/?p=187#comment-5301</guid>
		<description>You know, it&#039;s impossible to just completely annihilate an open source project which was downloaded thousands of times - anyone that downloaded it can take their copy and share it again... And that&#039;s what happened - most of why&#039;s projects are now available here: http://github.com/whymirror (probably not every single one, but most of them anyway).

Of course I agree with you that he should have done this in a different way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;s impossible to just completely annihilate an open source project which was downloaded thousands of times &#8211; anyone that downloaded it can take their copy and share it again&#8230; And that&#8217;s what happened &#8211; most of why&#8217;s projects are now available here: <a href="http://github.com/whymirror" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/whymirror</a> (probably not every single one, but most of them anyway).</p>
<p>Of course I agree with you that he should have done this in a different way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

