<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Make Enemies and Intimidate Customers, a vBulletin Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zahnster.com/software/how-to-make-enemies-and-intimidate-customers-a-vbulletin-story/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zahnster.com/software/how-to-make-enemies-and-intimidate-customers-a-vbulletin-story</link>
	<description>my name's jade. i'm a child of the internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:30:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zahnster</title>
		<link>http://zahnster.com/software/how-to-make-enemies-and-intimidate-customers-a-vbulletin-story/comment-page-1#comment-3583</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahnster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zahnster.com/?p=182#comment-3583</guid>
		<description>Ok sorry, but my oversimplification of the licensing versions offered changes nothing.

My client thought they had the &quot;owned&quot; license at $180, when in actuality they had only been setup with the $100 yearly license.

My client WOULD have bought the $180 license if they were approached about it in a non-aggressive manner.

But since we were treated like criminals, being judged and sentenced before we had a chance to defend ourselves or correct our mistake, we&#039;re choosing not to pay money to people who would rather throw a lawsuit around for an under $200 infringement than make a damn phone call.

So for that, I will be a vBulletin hater, and nothing about that will change my mind. Unless somehow time travel is involved and we never got threatened in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok sorry, but my oversimplification of the licensing versions offered changes nothing.</p>
<p>My client thought they had the &#8220;owned&#8221; license at $180, when in actuality they had only been setup with the $100 yearly license.</p>
<p>My client WOULD have bought the $180 license if they were approached about it in a non-aggressive manner.</p>
<p>But since we were treated like criminals, being judged and sentenced before we had a chance to defend ourselves or correct our mistake, we&#8217;re choosing not to pay money to people who would rather throw a lawsuit around for an under $200 infringement than make a damn phone call.</p>
<p>So for that, I will be a vBulletin hater, and nothing about that will change my mind. Unless somehow time travel is involved and we never got threatened in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Sheley</title>
		<link>http://zahnster.com/software/how-to-make-enemies-and-intimidate-customers-a-vbulletin-story/comment-page-1#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Sheley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zahnster.com/?p=182#comment-3581</guid>
		<description>A few issues with your post.

&quot;Long investigative story short, it turns out that my client was mistakenly in possession of a yearly license, and technically in the wrong. However, my client was misinformed when the site was built into thinking they had a permanent license, so the mistake was innocent enough.&quot;

and

&quot;We were running one recently expired version of vBulletin’s $180 software.&quot;

are wrong.
If your client had an owned license, that it doesn&#039;t have to be renewed to be running on their site.
If they had a leased license, it would.

Hope that helps you out, and maybe you wont be a vBulletin hater just because ONE person got a take down notice ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few issues with your post.</p>
<p>&#8220;Long investigative story short, it turns out that my client was mistakenly in possession of a yearly license, and technically in the wrong. However, my client was misinformed when the site was built into thinking they had a permanent license, so the mistake was innocent enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;We were running one recently expired version of vBulletin’s $180 software.&#8221;</p>
<p>are wrong.<br />
If your client had an owned license, that it doesn&#8217;t have to be renewed to be running on their site.<br />
If they had a leased license, it would.</p>
<p>Hope that helps you out, and maybe you wont be a vBulletin hater just because ONE person got a take down notice <img src='http://zahnster.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
